At
a writer's conference I attended earlier this year, there was some discussion
about genres. Both agents and publishers made it quite clear that if you are a
newly established or aspiring writer you have to commit to one genre of
writing. To skip from one genre to another or even worse lay claim to a cross-genre piece of work is a sure way to get the reject stamp across your
manuscript before the title page has been turned.
On
the face of it, it seems fair comment. To clinch that publishing deal or get
yourself a good agent, it's quite reasonable for them to identify exactly where
your writing is at.
It
seems that even quite established writers have to remain committed throughout
their careers. For instance, if an established sci fi writer decided he
wanted to skip the light fandango, turning cartwheels
cross the floor to turn his hand to say a good
swashbuckling pirate adventure, would this leave his sci fi readers feeling
kinda seasick? Or would he get new swashbuckling pirate readers, a
crowd calling out for more?
Okay I'll stop waxing lyrical before we all turn A
Whiter Shade of Pale.
There are, of course, exceptions to any rule, which
exempts a writer from genre specific creativity. Alas, this is beyond the reach
of most of us. If, however, you happen to find yourself at the top of the
literary food chain, then maybe, just maybe, (not guaranteed) your name can be
put to anything. You have become canonized as a BRAND.
Yes Ms JKR has made her departure on the Hogwart's
Express into the world of adult fiction. Adult fiction is about as genre
specific as she needs to get. She is not just 'a' brand, she is 'the' brand, or
is she?
I'm sure her new novel The Casual Vacancy will
be an amazing piece of work. JK's talent is indisputable. The magic of Harry
Potter enchanted both children and adults alike in books and on the
silver screen. I think she succeeded in finding the child within us all.
I'm sure she will sell squillions of copies on the day
that her new novel is released, but what are her follower's expectations? Will
her readers miss the incredible fantasy world that she created for Harry P?
Will adult themes such as sex, murder, or heaven forbid she may even say the
'f' word, sit well with her readers? Or will she retain the distinctive
ebullience and jolly hockey sticks flavour that has served her so well, and can
be quite refreshing?
I like to think I can write comedy. But I've said this
before and I'll keep saying it, I don't think comedy necessarily is a genre.
For me it is a style. Comedy is a voice, it is refers to the delivery of a good
story. It governs narrative, characterization and plot, true. I need to deliver
it in a particular manner. The characters either need to be either comic or
find themselves in comic situations. The plot must take at least one character
way out of his or her comfort zone to create the right level of absurdity
necessary to please the reader. It must have a happy ending. However, the story
needs to be believable and captivating and take the reader through more
emotions than merely rib-tickling laughter.
I think next time I pitch my work; I'm not going to say
its comedy or humour. I'll come up with as broad a genre as I can like adult
fiction something like chic lit or choc lit (whatever that is) but for both
genders.
I don't know if the
demand for genre is a modern thing. Dickens, Hardy and even Shakespeare were
not confined to genres. But during those days before they became immortal, were
they branded as brands?
In two weeks I will be going to Theakstons Old Peculiar Crimewriting Festival. I'm going to have an amazing time rubbing shoulders with some of the worlds best crimewriters and attending some workshops to hopefully improve the way I write. But hold on, I'm not a crimewriter. But I write and I may want to write a crime story in a comedic style. And I may find I have an affinity with some of the crimewriters , because they are writers. But that is not my main reason for attending.
In two weeks I will be going to Theakstons Old Peculiar Crimewriting Festival. I'm going to have an amazing time rubbing shoulders with some of the worlds best crimewriters and attending some workshops to hopefully improve the way I write. But hold on, I'm not a crimewriter. But I write and I may want to write a crime story in a comedic style. And I may find I have an affinity with some of the crimewriters , because they are writers. But that is not my main reason for attending.
I
read most genres from non-fiction through to biography and most genres of
fiction. But I'm a hopeless crime fiction addict when it comes to reading. I used
to read Hank Jansen and Mickey Spillane as a boy, so I suppose it has stayed
with me.
I
love classic literature, Thomas Hardy and Dickens being my favourites but also
went through a phase when I couldn't absorb enough Russian literature.
On my Facebook, Twitter and indeed this blog I have made connections
with all manner of different writers. I recently purchased a 'YOUNG
ADULT' novel Kiera's Quest: Awakenings by Kristy
Brown. (Do buy it on Amazon, she has a second book out soon) I
only bought it because I socially networked with the author, or I would never
have given it a second look had I seen it online or in a book shop. I don't
read much fantasy. However, I must admit this book intended for youngsters was
a guilty pleasure for me as a reader and it was an amazing piece of work. I
don't think I could do it. I can write about the world around me and even about
how the world was before me. But to create a whole new world with a different
civilisation with a unique eco system and mode of government is far beyond my
capability.
What's your genre of writing
and does it run parallel with your reading? Or do you think that a writer is a
writer regardless of genre and shouldn't have to commit to just one?